Fatpickled - Latest Comments

Re: John Riggins Is Still Chopping Wood

MİLWAUKEE — Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:38:26 -0000

MİLWAUKEE, MANYETİK MATKAP, KAROT MAKİNASI

Re: Googling The Redskins

Jason Anton — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:42:48 -0000

I think you have an unhealthy obsession with Gaffney's FedEx parcel.

Re: Knee Problems?

Knee Injury Compensation — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 02:10:44 -0000

Many things can cause a sprain. Falling, twisting, or getting hit canforce a joint out of its normal position. This can cause ligaments around the joint to stretch or tear. Sprains can occur if people:Fall and land on an arm,Fall on the side of their foot,Twist a knee.

Re: Help Reed Doughty Raise Kidney Disease Awareness

ADJUSTABLE BED SIDE RAILS — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:15:54 -0000

I support the National Kidney foundation because it has helped many people who are on dialysis, and have kidney disease. when I first found out I had PKD, and my kidneys failed, i was devastated. Because of the PKD, and NKF they gave me info to learn about what was happening to me, and my family and friends didn't understand, and were afraid. @MARIA

Re: Redskins Fans Are Outnumbered

DocJay78 — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:09:52 -0000

First Row Sports is a much better site to watch the games than CBS. Also with so many fan forums for the skins, you can follow most of the action without logging into CBS, and I have to say that I have never ever checked CBS sports online. If I cant find the game on first row, I stream the radio broadcast. If that doesnt work Ill check out myp2p or justintv. Than I will venture to ESPN as a last resort, and if none of those work, I go outside and play. I live in the heart of Panther territory and the Redskins games are almost never shown, unless on CBS(Patriots) or a night game.

Re: LaCanfora/Russell Twitter Banter Yields Interesting Nugget

RiggoDrill — Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:49:54 -0000

let me guess, you get high dont you? how can you count on a guy who doesnt care, he knew he was getting caught and suspended. Did it stop him? No. This doesnt have anything to do w/ if you consider mj laws just or unjust. It LEAGUE policy, LEAGUE rules PERIOD.

Re: LaCanfora/Russell Twitter Banter Yields Interesting Nugget

Statue97 — Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:55:25 -0000

I would be worried if it was some other drugs but weed come on man. It will be legal in every state in the next 10-15 years. The tax on Marijuana will probobly get the country out of Debt.. (SAD) Trent will be alright. LaCanfora has a Hello Kitty Bong in his basement.. And we all know the NFL Network does not drug test because Mike Irving is still on the air...

Re: LaCanfora/Russell Twitter Banter Yields Interesting Nugget

Danny — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 11:25:46 -0000

It can stay in your system for up to three months, so 11 failed test in three months is not a huge deal

Re: LaCanfora/Russell Twitter Banter Yields Interesting Nugget

bggb — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 09:35:47 -0000

Depends on what kind of test. Piss test it only lasts a month at most.

Re: LaCanfora/Russell Twitter Banter Yields Interesting Nugget

Kevo456 — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 09:19:27 -0000

Depending on how much he used in the offseason, marijuana can take a lot of time to leave the system. 11 Tests in three months, 4 tests a month. Still no excuse though.

Re: Fred Davis’ Ear Is Jacked

Rick — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 13:29:44 -0000

I remember hearing Davis talk about this on Redskins Nation, although I'm not completely sure of what he said the cause of it was. I believe it had something to do with an earring being pulled out, or at least something involving an earring/piercing.

Re: Fred Davis’ Ear Is Jacked

Dlane — Wed, 07 Dec 2011 03:24:08 -0000

I could be wrong, I am a medical student, but I believe it could be a keloid. They are commonly found on the earlobes and have higher incidence in those of african descent/darker skin. The main issue is a dysfunction of scar tissue and wound healing. Normally when the skin is injured (i.e. ear pierced) a certain type of collagen connective tissue (type III) is laid down to form the initial scar and then later that collagen type is replaced by another type (I) that resembles that of normal skin....this is why normal scars will heal and look more and more like normal tissue until they are barely noticeable. So in keloids the wrong type of collagen is laid down and the skin's reaction to this is to just keep laying down more and more scar tissue in response. Keloids can get very large and disfiguring. They are difficult to treat because surgical removal only creates new injury and further scarring. Most people who are prone to developing keloids need to use preventative measures to avoid injuring their skin. This would be very difficult, obviously, for a professional football player who may have the helmet, strap, etc. cause injury. As I said this is what I thought it might be; however, it could just as easily be an infected cyst or just inflammation do to any number of reasons.

Re: Building A Winner Doesn’t Happen One Loss At A Time

Bingopajama — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:30:17 -0000

I like what you tried to do with the post, but I think our quarterback issue pretty much disproves your point. Why? Most good quaterbacks are taken very early in the draft. Not always, but the majority are taken early.

NE: has had it's franchise quarterback for 11-12 years, and this one proves your point about quality being everywhere. Tom was taken in the 6th round, although this in my opinion is the exception not the rule

Baltimore: Flacco was taken with the 18th pick in 2008. Does this prove that quality quarterbacks can be picked up late in the first round? Not really... Very few teams picked/ needed QBs in the first round, Flacco was the second QB to go, with the exception of Atlanta who had a top 5 pick and took Matt Ryan. The teams that are picking in the top of the draft this year would not let the 2nd highest QB fall to 18.

Ind: the exact opposite of your point. Peyton was the number 1 pick in 1998. 10 years of draft data does nothing since it was further back than that.

Phi: Another team that defies your point. They had a franchise quarterback for most of the past 10 years, and guess what, he was picked 2nd in 1999. Their acquisition of vick had nothign to do with the draft

SD: Another team that doesn't work. The year they had the number 1 pick they traded down to four and got their quarterback.

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

Jason Anton — Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:42:04 -0000

Yes. If you didn't win you lost. For me, in a tie, both teams failed to win, so they lost.

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

Ben — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 18:06:54 -0000

so both teams lose a tie game?

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

Jason Anton — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:03:11 -0000

If you ain't first your last, if you didn't win you lost. I don't care what "officials" say. They're at .500 to me.

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

Fatpickle — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:01:10 -0000

yep...I was wrong. The winning % is figured differently. My bad. The Redskins have still won half the games they played for the first time in 70+ years. How a tie is a "half win, half loss" is beyond me.

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

Corey Burnett — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:26:55 -0000

I think your math is a little off. 550-523-27 equals a winning percentage of about .512. See the following: http://answers.yahoo.com/quest.... A tie is a half win.

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

Triton — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:56:55 -0000

For the first time since 1876 the Redskins are .500 half win team is a gorgeous article

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

Ben — Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:50:10 -0000

ties count as half of a win/half of a loss for winning percentage in every instance i've ever seen

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

Fatpickle — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:49:54 -0000

It's 550-523-27. Dipshit.

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

Fatpickle — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:46:44 -0000

uh, yes it does. It's the way the NFL figures the %. And suck a D.

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

revjtanton — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 19:12:25 -0000

"Hello?! You play to WIN the game...."

FP was right on the money. If they have not WON more than half their games then they're .500 for WINNING percentage.

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

Think before you type — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:17:49 -0000

Tim is right... look at 2008 (last NFL tie)... 550 wins, 523 losses is .513 ... ties don't count as losses. If you want to say they have won 50% of their games, that is correct... but it isn't .500

Re: For The First Time Since 1937 The Redskins Are .500

Tim Jones — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:10:23 -0000

Hey Moron, 550-223-27 does not equal .500